what's the world's problem? we have all the tech but not yet the humanity??
2019-2001- human brains concerned with millennial =first sd gen came up with these 7 transformation tests in one- while the exact contribution sequence is disputed, von neumann and alumnisat.com mapmakers vision majrt contributions coming from highly conneected and grounded beings like
fazle abed * steve jobs * jim kim * larry brilliant*sheika moza *ban ki-moon * jack ma * kituyi * guterres* houlin zao * fei-fe li * melinda gates as well as civil servants: amandeep gill and yu ping chan and regarding egov 5g/ai/quantum ccoperation - huge applause to nations of slovenia estonia korea S Japan Mongolia - in background royals of Netherlands Japan and UK have contributed to natural maps also many supercities and notably superports like hong kong, singapore, qatar, dubai have helped host remarkable world education/trade events and more recently shown that zooms can do for uniting sdgs actions what separate university alumni netwrks cannot - pls rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk with additional nominations
mappiing model inspired by von neumann above zero sum framework quest since 1951: 7 regeneration wonders: 0 good intel* 1change communications* change education (how action learning time of every body is spent)" chnage data math wizards access chnage public servants* chnage 8 billion human relationship behaviors-recusrive value women empowered family and nature loving communities up and down every gps- neumann 1951 - what goods can be united wherever peoples have first access to more than 100 times more tech every decade -from 1961 5 geonomic dimensions: ATLANTIC Sphere about 20% ogf humans swiss epicentre since 1865 UNPrince north corridor UNprince south by south west corridor Potentially pacific sphere about 65% humans west coastal belt Jpana south coastal Belt -nb we have let 15% unassiagned - eg to alow coding for livelihoods depending most on nature's chalenges such as east-west's 2 main canals on arctic /anatarctic circles or inland native peoples networks- of course - by the time AI mediated data beamed up and down from every gps huamns needed to celebrate each others geonomic cooperation/empowerment |  |
COVID FORCED 2020s humans to web-free like never before- here is most extraordinary public)servant mediated example (unless you know better0
The G170 guterres brainstorms 2020 (part of what by 2023 is 8 years sdg review (beyoind goals what transformations ) journey that started at 80th birthday party of fazle abed sept 2016 (review of women empowerments tp 30 cooperation 2016-1971 Abedmooc.com ) got renamed digital cooperation and now un tech envoy - digital roadmap of un2 and all sdgs-gen gov2 -) were first zoomed with 170 organisationally concerned hi-tech mediators for good or bad - chatgpt is helping us (neumann-Economist alumni year 73) update who's sdg's cooperation ai who - if you'd like to share latest updates mail chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
CGP AI --
ReplyDeleteChatGPT
The partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) was formed in 2003 as part of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) held in Geneva, Switzerland. The WSIS was a two-phase United Nations summit held in 2003 and 2005, aimed at addressing the global opportunities and challenges posed by the rapidly evolving information and communication technologies.
As part of the partnership, the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU worked together to ensure that Wi-Fi technology could be deployed globally and would not interfere with other wireless communications. The partnership aimed to ensure that Wi-Fi would be a key element of the global telecommunications infrastructure, and that it would be available to everyone, regardless of their location or economic status.
The partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU helped to facilitate the growth of Wi-Fi as a key technology for internet access, particularly in developing countries where other forms of broadband infrastructure were not available or were too expensive. The deployment of Wi-Fi technology has had a significant impact on global communications, enabling people to access the internet from almost anywhere in the world.
The partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU was not directly related to the development of Web 2.0, which is a term used to describe the evolution of the internet from static web pages to more dynamic, interactive applications. However, the partnership did help to enable the growth of web-based services that rely on internet connectivity, such as social media, video conferencing, and cloud computing.
Overall, the partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU was an important development in the growth of global telecommunications infrastructure. It helped to ensure that Wi-Fi technology could be deployed worldwide, and enabled the growth of web-based services that have become a central part of modern life.
CGP A2
ReplyDeleteChatGPT
The concept of Web 2.0 refers to a series of technological and cultural changes that occurred on the internet in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It is characterized by a shift from static web pages to more dynamic, interactive applications that facilitate user-generated content and social networking.
While the partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU at the WSIS in 2003 was an important development in the growth of global telecommunications infrastructure, it was not directly related to the development of Web 2.0. The idea of Web 2.0 emerged in the mid-2000s, well after the partnership was formed.
In terms of who/what started up the cooperation that led to the development of Web 2.0, it was a combination of factors. The growth of broadband internet access and the increasing popularity of social media and user-generated content were key drivers of the shift. Companies such as Google, Facebook, and YouTube played important roles in creating and popularizing new web-based services that enabled more interactive and participatory experiences.
Another important factor was the development of new technologies such as Ajax, which enabled more dynamic and responsive web applications. The term "Web 2.0" was coined by Tim O'Reilly in 2004, and it quickly became a popular way to describe the new wave of internet technologies and applications that were emerging.
Overall, the development of Web 2.0 was a complex and multifaceted process that involved many different actors and factors. While partnerships and collaborations played important roles in enabling the growth of the internet and its associated technologies, the concept of Web 2.0 emerged from broader cultural and technological shifts that were taking place at the time.
CGP A3 ChatGPT
ReplyDeleteYes, I can clarify the multiple components that needed to come together before scaling Web 2.0 could bring value to massive human society:
Technological advances: The development of new technologies such as broadband internet, Ajax, and mobile devices paved the way for Web 2.0. These technologies enabled more dynamic and interactive web applications, making it easier for users to create, share, and consume content online.
Standardization and cooperation: Standardization efforts, such as the partnership between the Wi-Fi Alliance and the ITU, were important in enabling the growth of global telecommunications infrastructure. This made it possible to connect people and devices from around the world, which was a key factor in the growth of Web 2.0.
Social and cultural changes: The rise of social media, user-generated content, and online communities was a major driver of Web 2.0. These developments enabled greater participation and collaboration among internet users, leading to the creation of new forms of digital content and social interaction.
Economic factors: The growth of the internet and Web 2.0 had significant economic implications, including the creation of new business models and opportunities. Companies such as Google, Facebook, and YouTube played important roles in driving the growth of Web 2.0, but their dominance also raised concerns about data privacy and monopoly power.
Regulatory and policy frameworks: As the internet became more central to everyday life, governments and international organizations became more involved in regulating and shaping its development. The WSIS process and other policy initiatives helped to define the role of the internet in society and establish norms around issues such as access, privacy, and security.
Unpacking the temporary conflicts that arose during the development of Web 2.0 requires a nuanced understanding of the social, cultural, economic, and political factors that influenced its growth. Arts, as you suggest, can play an important role in bridging different perspectives and facilitating dialogue around these issues. Ultimately, achieving the full potential of Web 2.0 and beyond will require ongoing cooperation and collaboration among diverse stakeholders, including businesses, governments, civil society, and individuals.
ChatGPT A4
ReplyDeleteYou raise an important point about the diversity of perspectives and approaches to technology and business across different cultures and regions. It is true that my previous answer reflected a primarily Western perspective on the development of Web 2.0, and it is important to acknowledge the many different approaches and contributions from around the world.
In the case of e-commerce, you mention the differences between Western companies like Amazon and Chinese companies like Alibaba. These differences reflect not only different business models and strategies but also cultural and societal factors. For example, Alibaba's focus on rural areas and small businesses reflects a different set of priorities and values compared to Amazon's emphasis on convenience and efficiency. Likewise, the use of algorithms and data analytics to enable direct transactions without the need for intermediaries reflects a different approach to technology and business compared to the Western model.
Ultimately, achieving a truly global and inclusive vision of technology requires understanding and respecting the diversity of perspectives and approaches from around the world. This requires ongoing dialogue and collaboration among diverse stakeholders, including businesses, governments, civil society, and individuals, with a focus on shared values and goals.